Qualifications review consultation and call for evidence analysis
The value below is a framework or dynamic market ceiling: the maximum
that could be spent across all call-offs, not the value of a single contract.
Aggregate figures on this site exclude these to avoid double counting.
key details
| Value | £15,870 |
|---|---|
| Status | complete |
| Category (CPV) | 73110000 |
| Deadline | 24 Jan 2021 |
| Contract start | 25 Jan 2021 |
| Contract end | 16 Mar 2021 |
| Procedure | selective |
| SME suitable | Yes |
| OCID | ocds-b5fd17-9b3e9650-9235-4b2c-aa1a-1b0f82e17191 |
Award
| Supplier | Value | Date | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Methods Business and Digital Technology Limited | £15,870 | 25 Jan 2021 | active |
description
- Carry out analysis of all the responses to the consultation and the call for evidence. We would like a meeting at the beginning of the contract so that we can provide any helpful background about the policy, and the option of further meetings to discuss draft reports. The analysis should be by topic and pull out any differences by respondent type where appropriate.
- Produce a separate interim report for each of the consultation and the call for evidence, focusing on a few priority questions.
- Deliver a presentation of the findings once the analysis is completed, but before the reports are finalised.
- Produce two full final reports (one for the call for evidence and one for the consultation) for internal use, which will inform the government response to the consultation exercises and policy development. To ensure quality of the reports, we require up to two drafts of each report before the final version, to be commented on by our team. We would like the reports to identify the key themes and findings for each question, identifying where a trend varies by respondent type, or has been given disproportionate weight due to a campaign (where organisation(s) submit duplicate responses).
- Produce summary reports for each of the call for evidence and consultation, containing the overall key findings, which we could publish alongside the government response on gov.uk if we deem appropriate.
notice history
1 notice published against this procurement.
| Published | Type | Regime | Notice |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25 Mar 2021 | Award (award) | · | 63ddc86b-9317-43b7-95f2-709dc9af4da4-423369 |
more from Department for Education
- Tackling Antisemitism in Education Innovation Fund - Competitive Grant · £1,000,000 · 29 Jul 2026
- SEND Adviser Contract: London Boroughs of Camden, Ealing, Kensington and Chelsea, Lewisham & Westminster (con_31627) · £54,000 · 24 Jul 2026
- Flagship SEN School -Main Works (con_31833) · £3,540,678 · 24 Jul 2026
- River Tees Academy - Main Works (con_31827) · £20,792,548 · 24 Jul 2026
- Haygrove School- PCSA (con_31817) · £3,199,906 · 24 Jul 2026
- Wellfield Academy - Main Works (con_31815) · £44,887,810 · 24 Jul 2026
- Europa School UK - Main Works (con_31805) · £8,366,969 · 24 Jul 2026
- Anglo European School - Main Works (con_31751) · £53,313,769 · 24 Jul 2026
all contracts from this buyer →
similar contracts awarded
Other awarded contracts in the same category. Useful for seeing who normally wins this kind of work, and at what value.
- Award of DLEARN-Doran Review Research · Scottish Government · £120,000
- RSGR0002 Rail Evaluation Call-Off Contract · DfTc - Department for Transport · £3,000,000
- Award of Liability for council tax debt: A review of the evidence for victim-survivors of domesti... · Scottish Government · £18,798
- MoJ and ALB Media Monitoring Service retender 2026 · Ministry of Justice · £198,524
- Provision of Evaluation Research Support - Lot 2 · DfTc - Department for Transport · £1,250,000
- Provision of Evaluation Research Support - Lot 1 · DfTc - Department for Transport · £1,250,000
- Independent Evaluation of the MoJ Legal Support Grant 2026-2029 · Ministry of Justice · £929,670
- Evaluation of Impacts on the Conservation features of protected sites within the North Chilterns · Natural England · £24,740
source
Published on Contracts Finder. Contact details for named individuals are not reproduced on this site.