gvtcx

Charging Infrastructure Strategy - Metropolitan Police Service

Metropolitan Police Service Published 14 Jun 2019 Contracts Finder

key details

Value£50,000
Statusactive
Category (CPV) 50111110 +4 more
Deadline26 Jun 2019
Contract start29 Jul 2019
Contract end30 Jul 2021
SME suitableYes
OCIDocds-b5fd17-5f82fd62-7ed8-4c7d-be3f-20e885753bcd

description

The Metropolitan Police Service are committed to transitioning the vehicle fleet over to hybrid and ultimately zero emission technology to meet the governments aspiration to drive to zero emissions by 2050. To support this the MPS is looking for a partner to help with our strategic plans to install 600 charging points across the estate.

The key points of delivery will be:

  • To validate the output of the strategy model, including an assessment of available power and parking spaces at various buildings within the estate
  • To determine the charging infrastructure required per building and defining a detailed 5-year plan
  • To develop a robust cost model for this infrastructure
  • To assess further charging infrastructure opportunities, including and not limited to:
  • On-street charging
  • Publicly accessible charging
  • Energy storage solutions

Supplier evaluation will be initially assessed on technical capability subject to suitability. The next stage will involve evaluation of the cost proposal. The top two highest scoring bidders will then be required to present their proposal to the Fleet Services evaluation panel.

Supplier evaluation will be initially assessed on technical capability subject to suitability. The next stage will involve evaluation of the cost proposal. The top two highest scoring bidders will then be required to present their proposal to the Fleet Services evaluation panel.

The Technical Criteria Evaluation - Weighting 50%:

Suppliers will be expected to demonstrate their ability to deliver the above requirements. Fleet Services will consider the following factors in selection of the most suitable supplier.

  • Ability and approach to meeting the requirements - Weight15%
  • Previous experience in this field - Weighting 10%
  • Previous case studies - Weighting 7.5%
  • Timescales to visit 70 sites - Weighting 5%
  • Bio for any staff undertaking the activity - Weighting 7.5%
  • Vetting status of any staff involved - Weighting 5%

Cost Proposal Evaluation - Weighting 40%:

The Total Lowest Cost bid will achieve maximum score 100%. All other bid scores will be assessed as a percentage against the highest bidders score. See calculation below:

Lowest Cost Bid/Highest Cost Bid x 100%

For Example:

Supplier A (Lowest cost bidder) - £1000/£1000 x 100% = 100% Supplier B (all other bids) - 1000/£2000 x 100% = 50%

Presentation - Weighting 10%:

The top two bidders are required to present their technical capability and will be assessed on the following:

  • Approach to deliver the requirement - Weighting 4%
  • Case studies - Weighting 3%
  • Delivery team - Weighting 3%

Your final submission should include the following:

  1. A full and complete technical proposal
  2. A full and complete cost proposal
  3. A copy of your public liability insurance certificate
  4. Confirmation that you agree to the standard MPS payment terms and for payments to be made by BACS transfer, and a completed attached form if you are a new contractor.

Questions and electronic submissions answering all the points above are to be emailed to Selina.Patel2@met.police.uk no later than midday on Wednesday 26th June 2019.

documents

Documents are linked, not mirrored. They are served by the publishing authority and may require registration.

notice history

1 notice published against this procurement.

PublishedTypeRegimeNotice
14 Jun 2019 Tender (tender) · 85dda1ba-de77-451f-92f6-09025ee1b2b5-295374

more from Metropolitan Police Service

all contracts from this buyer →

similar contracts awarded

Other awarded contracts in the same category. Useful for seeing who normally wins this kind of work, and at what value.

source

Published on Contracts Finder. Contact details for named individuals are not reproduced on this site.