RSSB2655 - T1140 - Rail Vehicle Seat Comfort - Supplier Engagement Event Friday 6th October
key details
| Status | planning |
|---|---|
| Category (CPV) | 71323000 +3 more |
| OCID | ocds-b5fd17-5e04538b-4ea1-4b1c-852a-b0e11fabe6eb |
description
RSSB is holding a supplier engagement event on Friday 6th October at 2pm at the RSSB offices in Moorgate.
If you would like to attend please email the below email address by 5pm on Thursday 5th October:
Shareditt@rssb.co.uk
--
Passenger comfort during rail travel is an important aspect of the customer experience, and forms part of the rolling stock vision for comfortable and attractive train interiors (Rail Technical Strategy, 2012). One key aspect of passenger comfort is the seat, and the comfort of the seating area may contribute up to 5% of the overall impact on customer satisfaction (National Rail Passenger Survey, 2016). Recent passenger satisfaction scores also revealed that 72% of passengers (n = 25,541) reported satisfied or good level of comfort of the seating area (National Rail Passenger Survey, 2016). Whilst such satisfaction scores appear promising, continuous improvement of customer satisfaction is a key object of the Rail Technical Strategy, under the theme of Customer Experience. As guidance, a general target to achieve 90% passenger satisfaction levels by 2035 (not specific to seat comfort) was proposed in the Long Term Planning Ahead Framework (2010 ), and subsequently supported in the Rail Technical Strategy (RTS). Clearly, improvements in seat comfort satisfaction scores may contribute to reaching this industry wide target.
However, currently there is a lack of quantifiable parameters available to sufficiently assess and demonstrate passenger seat comfort for new and refurbished trains, which risks overlooking customer experience. A recent RSSB Knowledge Search (S240, 2016) on seat comfort revealed that while few measures exist to quantify passenger seat comfort, a standardised specification of seat comfort is yet to be established. Moreover, the knowledge search findings indicated that current measures do not provide a minimum threshold value accounting for subjective tests of perception from the general public. Subsequently, quantifying passenger seat comfort may build a predictive model to support Train Operating Companies (TOCs) & Rolling Stock Operating Companies (ROSCOs) to select cost-effective new and refurbished seats in line with the passenger experience.
Accordingly, the Rail Industry Vehicle/Vehicle System Interface Committee set up a Seat Comfort Group specifically to look at passenger seat comfort, and identified that the RDG Key Train Requirements (KTR) could benefit from specifying more information on passenger seat comfort. In doing so, it is hoped that this research will impact improvements in seat quality and enhanced customer experience, while also facilitating innovation options and potential competition among TOCs to provide comfortable seating across the industry.
notice history
1 notice published against this procurement.
| Published | Type | Regime | Notice |
|---|---|---|---|
| 16 Oct 2017 | Planning (planning) | · | 3472d632-714d-4b59-a9b8-255acd5e52c7-176493 |
more from RAIL SAFETY AND STANDARDS BOARD LIMITED
- T1305 - Codify the impact of professional driving policies and defining best practice guidance · 20 Apr 2022
- T1261 - The use of AI in the Context of Spoken Safety Critical Communications · 27 Jan 2022
- T1273 Optimising drivers' use of audible warnings in all potential warning scenarios · 24 Nov 2021
- T1244 Characterising the Pantograph and Overhead Contact System · 20 Jan 2021
- T1223-02 Wheelset Coating Systems and Good Practice Guidance · 26 Nov 2020
- T1210 ADHERE Sander quality and performance criteria framework · 25 Aug 2020
- T1219-02 RESILIENT: Anti-icing and de-icing mitigations for pantograph and Overhead Line Equipment · 29 Jun 2020
- T1214 DECARB: 21st Century DC electrification infill · 5 Jun 2020
all contracts from this buyer →
similar contracts awarded
Other awarded contracts in the same category. Useful for seeing who normally wins this kind of work, and at what value.
- Multifunctional Polymer Chemistry Pilot Plant Pilot Plant and Modification/Upgrades to Facility · Centre for Process Innovation · £2,000,000
- Multifunctional Polymer Chemistry Pilot Plant Pilot Plant and Modification/Upgrades to Facility - AWARD · CPI (Centre for Process Innovation)
- New Product Introduction (NPI) Process Development · Sellafield Limited
- RHILW Project Definition & Optioneering · CTM Portal for the NDA Shared Services Alliance · £476,309
- ITEG EPC · European Marine Energy Centre (EMEC) Ltd · £650,000
- Supply of Fixtures for Boeing UK Fabrication Project · UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD · £73,000
- Rockefeller Generator Connection Project · UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON · £35,000
source
Published on Contracts Finder. Contact details for named individuals are not reproduced on this site.