gvtcx

Expert Advice on Assessing Customer Valuations

WATER SERVICES REGULATION AUTHORITY Published 17 May 2018 Contracts Finder
The value below is a framework or dynamic market ceiling: the maximum that could be spent across all call-offs, not the value of a single contract. Aggregate figures on this site exclude these to avoid double counting.

key details

Statuscomplete
Category (CPV) 73200000
RegionWest Midlands, London
Deadline14 Feb 2018
Contract start26 Feb 2018
Contract end29 Mar 2018
Procedureselective
SME suitableYes
OCIDocds-b5fd17-1e4ea33c-7fa7-484c-80b8-496a46f254e3

Award

SupplierValueDateStatus
ICF CONSULTING SERVICES LIMITED £32,588 21 Feb 2018 active

description

We require expert advice on assessing companies' evidence on customer valuation techniques such as stated preference willingness to pay, revealed preference willingness to pay, experiments, behavioural economic approaches, data from day-to-day contacts etc. Companies will use these techniques to support their business plan proposals for the 2019 price review (PR19). We expect the suppliers to set out what good looks like for these customer valuation techniques, which will involve some consideration of their limitations as well as their strengths.

We will use this expert advice to inform our development of the initial assessment plan (IAP) tests that involve assessing companies' evidence on customer valuations. [Note: we do not require the contractor to develop these tests].

We will require the supplier to provide a workshop to Ofwat staff on what good looks like for customer valuation techniques and what to look out for when assessing companies' customer valuations at PR19.

Tasks for the supplier

Ofwat welcomes views on different or additional steps that it would need to consider to ensure it meet its objective.

1.Task 1 - Evaluate the use of different customer valuation techniques - this should draw on a range of literature as well as the lessons learnt from PR14. In evaluating the different approaches the supplier should:
Set out the limitations of each of the techniques.
Outline what analysis and challenges we can apply to test the validity of each technique.
Outline the issues associated with the practical application of each technique.
Identify what good look likes for each technique.

This work should complement the research that has already been carried out on behalf of CCWater. Particular focus should be given to less familiar methods, for instance, behavioural experiments.

  1. Task 2 - Identify which customer valuation techniques companies could apply at PR19 for their customer engagement, performance outcomes, ODIs and cost adjustment claims. [Note that this has been done to some extent by the work carried out on behalf of CCWater.]
  1. Task 3 - The supplier should write a report providing expert advice on assessing companies' evidence on customer valuation techniques such as stated preference willingness to pay, revealed preference willingness to pay, experiments, behavioural economic approaches, data from day-to-day contacts etc. The report can use studies. These case studies can come from a range of sectors.
  1. Task 4 - The supplier should provide a workshop to Ofwat staff on what good looks like for customer valuation techniques and what to look out for when assessing companies' customer valuations at PR19.

notice history

1 notice published against this procurement.

PublishedTypeRegimeNotice
17 May 2018 Award update (awardUpdate) · 5b7210b3-bae1-46e5-a116-29bbf84babf2-216828

more from WATER SERVICES REGULATION AUTHORITY

all contracts from this buyer →

similar contracts awarded

Other awarded contracts in the same category. Useful for seeing who normally wins this kind of work, and at what value.

source

Published on Contracts Finder. Contact details for named individuals are not reproduced on this site.