Evaluation of Mentoring Training
key details
| Value | £50,472 |
|---|---|
| Status | complete |
| Category (CPV) | 73110000 +4 more |
| Region | North East, Yorkshire and the Humber, North West, East Midlands, West Midlands, East of England, South East, South West, London |
| Deadline | 7 Oct 2021 |
| Contract start | 25 Oct 2021 |
| Contract end | 31 Mar 2022 |
| Procedure | open |
| SME suitable | Yes |
| OCID | ocds-b5fd17-5fcbd6d2-d8bb-49de-9f02-8f456c087b7a |
Award
| Supplier | Value | Date | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Institute For Employment Studies | £50,472 | 18 Oct 2021 | active |
description
The Education and Training Foundation (ETF) has awarded a contract for the provision of services to deliver an independent process evaluation for workforce development in the mentoring programme area. The evaluation will consider participants' perceptions of how the programme affects their professional practice, provider performance and learner outcomes. It will compare the effectiveness of different programme strands in meeting the programme objectives, recommend improvements to strengthen programme quality and impact, and inform future programme investment and design decisions.
The partner will evaluate the mentoring programme area delivered in England by the ETF with DfE grant funding during 2021-22. The process evaluation will follow HM Treasury evaluation guidance and consider the following: sufficiency of programme resources; programme design and whether it was delivered as intended; unintended issues in programme delivery; whether the programme reached its intended beneficiaries; the quality of programme outputs and participant satisfaction; what worked well and what could be improved; external factors influencing programme delivery and intended beneficiaries. Evidence will include the following: programme management information; surveys and interviews collecting participants' perceptions of their experience; interviews collecting delivery partners' perceptions of their contributions; interviews collecting programme managers' perceptions of programme design and delivery. The evaluation will use ETF programme management information and surveys co-designed with and administered by the ETF, in addition to collecting other primary data and analysing secondary data.
notice history
1 notice published against this procurement.
| Published | Type | Regime | Notice |
|---|---|---|---|
| 16 Dec 2021 | Award (award) | · | 34d67ffe-4fdb-4442-84d5-87401e3c44c1-494835 |
more from The Education and Training Foundation
- Expression of Interest for SEND Associates · 25 Apr 2025
- Award of technical support for the ETF Learners website · £38,501 · 18 Oct 2024
- Award of the Middle Leaders (ACE) programme · £52,500 · 18 Oct 2024
- Award of the CPTE in Digital · £28,000 · 18 Oct 2024
- Award of the Assessment in T Levels in FE courses · £61,000 · 18 Oct 2024
- Award of Assessment in T Levels in FE courses · £47,000 · 18 Oct 2024
- Award of Teaching T Levels in FE courses · £30,800 · 18 Oct 2024
- Award of the CPTE in Engineering and Manufacturing · £25,500 · 18 Oct 2024
similar contracts awarded
Other awarded contracts in the same category. Useful for seeing who normally wins this kind of work, and at what value.
- Aviation Local Air Quality Dispersal Modelling · DfTc - Department for Transport · £90,000
- Reducing Parental Conflict - National Offer User research · IFF Research Limited · £149,410
- CSSF-002 - GDF Criticality Safety Methodology and Assessments · Nuclear Waste Services · £80,000
- CSSF-001 - Support to international post closure criticality safety projects. · Nuclear Waste Services · £60,000
- User Research Contract · Office for National Statistics · £3,000,000
- Provision of Human Factors & Ergonomics Call-off Contract Created · DfTc - Department for Transport
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) Reforms Evaluation & DWP Employer Survey · Department for Work & Pensions · £2,010,611
- UKRI-5456 EPSRC Mixed Gender Panel Policy (MGPP) Evaluation · UK Research and Innovation · £125,000
source
Published on Contracts Finder. Contact details for named individuals are not reproduced on this site.