gvtcx

Targeted Review of Defined Benefit Pensions and Financial Resilience

WATER SERVICES REGULATION AUTHORITY Published 17 May 2018 Contracts Finder
The value below is a framework or dynamic market ceiling: the maximum that could be spent across all call-offs, not the value of a single contract. Aggregate figures on this site exclude these to avoid double counting.

key details

Statuscomplete
Category (CPV) 66523000 +1 more
RegionWest Midlands, London
Deadline19 Feb 2018
Contract start26 Feb 2018
Contract end31 Mar 2018
Procedureselective
SME suitableYes
OCIDocds-b5fd17-5a1aedae-4331-43ce-a897-e116a035f796

Award

SupplierValueDateStatus
Barnett Waddingham LLP £70,000 23 Feb 2018 active

description

The targeted review will consider:

How do pension scheme deficits as calculated under International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) compare to actuarial deficits calculated under a triennial actuarial valuation in absolute terms and variability?
Have companies used customer funding to the extent provided for at PR09 (and reaffirmed at PR14) to meet deficit repair costs since 2010?
What range of actions have companies taken to manage their exposures to pension liabilities, how effective have these measures been in managing risks and what else could companies have done?
How does the management of the pension deficit in the water sector compare with best practice approaches in other sectors?
What evidence is there that pension schemes have or are moving to CPI or CPIH as the inflation linkage?
Pension costs impact on financial resilience as they reduce the free cash available to meet a company's statutory obligations. A short repair period increases the pressure on free cash while a long period may result in action by the Pension Regulator. Does the essential service provided by water companies and economic regulation underpin the water sector's covenant for pension obligations and strengthen pension scheme resilience?
Rating agencies consider deficits when assessing credit ratings and effectively treat deficits as debt. How should deficits be considered when assessing a company's financial resilience?
Hypothetically, how would pension liabilities be considered under a special administration pursuant to the Water Industry Act 1991 (as amended)?
We would welcome additional comments from the contractors on areas to consider not covered by the above.

Scope

The scope of this work includes assessing published information on all 17 English and Welsh water and waste water companies' pension schemes and preparing an information request for all companies. Following this review selecting a number of companies which display a variety of actions in managing pension liabilities for further engagement and lead tele-conferences with the selected companies. The number of companies will not exceed 5. To consider and report on the specific questions set out in this ITT, relating to company behaviours and actions associated with pension deficits which have since 2009 been funded in part by customers.

notice history

1 notice published against this procurement.

PublishedTypeRegimeNotice
17 May 2018 Award update (awardUpdate) · ac28e335-0373-44bc-b1d5-a060ebd3a1de-216842

more from WATER SERVICES REGULATION AUTHORITY

all contracts from this buyer →

similar contracts awarded

Other awarded contracts in the same category. Useful for seeing who normally wins this kind of work, and at what value.

source

Published on Contracts Finder. Contact details for named individuals are not reproduced on this site.