RSSB2750 - Review of the Uff-Cullen Recommendations related to train protection systems (T1169)
key details
| Value | £40,000 |
|---|---|
| Status | active |
| Category (CPV) | 72221000 +1 more |
| Deadline | 17 Dec 2018 |
| Contract start | 18 Jan 2019 |
| Contract end | 31 May 2019 |
| Procedure | open |
| SME suitable | Yes |
| OCID | ocds-b5fd17-38897b5c-be83-43d1-ae70-a7bb458ded13 |
description
Following two signal passed at danger (SPAD)-related accidents at Southall (1997) and Ladbroke Grove (1999), a joint report into train protection systems was published by Professor John Uff and the Right Honourable Lord Cullen in 2001 . The Uff-Cullen report recommended the roll out of automatic train protection, in which a system intervenes if the driver of a train is going too fast or will exceed the end of a movement authority.
The train protection system envisaged to meet this recommendation was the European Train Control Systems (ETCS). It was recognised, however, that the roll out of this system was complex and expensive in comparison to the Train Protection and Warning System (TPWS) that was already available and proving to be effective. The RSSB 'AWS and TPWS Handbook' provides the following summary on TPWS:
'The purpose of TPWS is to stop the train by automatically initiating a brake demand, where TPWS track equipment is fitted, if the train has:
| • | passed a signal at danger without authority |
| • | approached a signal at danger too fast |
| • | approached a reduction in permissible speed too fast |
| • | approached buffer stops too fast. |
TPWS is not designed to prevent SPADs but to mitigate against the consequences of a SPAD, by preventing a train that has had a SPAD from reaching a conflict point ahead of the signal.
TPWS does not relieve the driver of responsibility for observing signals and speed restrictions.'
The Uff-Cullen report supported the accelerated rollout of TPWS as an interim measure and envisaged that TPWS would be followed by the deployment of a higher level of protection due to the limited functionality and lack of a fail-safe. This would be delivered by the roll out of automatic train protection using ETCS. It was proposed this would start with higher speed, higher traffic lines, which would be complete by 2020 .
To date TPWS has been very effective in helping to manage and reduce the residual risk from SPADs. From March 2003 to March 2008 the national level of underlying SPAD risk fell by around 80%. This reduction can be attributed to three major initiatives:
| 1. | Industry-wide focus on the risk from SPADs |
| 2. | Installation of TPWS at all main aspect signals protecting junctions |
| 3. | Removal of Mark 1 rolling stock |
More recently however, the residual risk from SPADs has plateaued. SPADs still remain a concern for the industry and there is currently a SPAD Risk Reduction Strategy being embedded as well as many ongoing initiatives to help reduce this risk further.
In terms of progress in fitting automatic train protection, the industry set up a national ERTMS (European Rail Traffic Management System) Programme to roll out ETCS starting with high speed lines in Control Period (CP) 4.
documents
- https://www.contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/Notice/3c3a78c0-8f5b-47d1-8856-5168e7a5ce8b , tenderNotice
- https://www.contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/Notice/Attachment/417aabce-9714-4364-9fe7-4e049d461a9d , biddingDocuments
- https://www.contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/Notice/Attachment/b5dd5c47-e104-444e-8918-5ce110a42026 , biddingDocuments
- https://www.contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/Notice/Attachment/fed13cc3-e8be-4fde-8059-e8138076cf47 , technicalSpecifications
Documents are linked, not mirrored. They are served by the publishing authority and may require registration.
notice history
1 notice published against this procurement.
| Published | Type | Regime | Notice |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19 Nov 2018 | Tender (tender) | · | 3c3a78c0-8f5b-47d1-8856-5168e7a5ce8b-253349 |
more from RAIL SAFETY AND STANDARDS BOARD LIMITED
- T1305 - Codify the impact of professional driving policies and defining best practice guidance · 20 Apr 2022
- T1261 - The use of AI in the Context of Spoken Safety Critical Communications · 27 Jan 2022
- T1273 Optimising drivers' use of audible warnings in all potential warning scenarios · 24 Nov 2021
- T1244 Characterising the Pantograph and Overhead Contact System · 20 Jan 2021
- T1223-02 Wheelset Coating Systems and Good Practice Guidance · 26 Nov 2020
- T1210 ADHERE Sander quality and performance criteria framework · 25 Aug 2020
- T1219-02 RESILIENT: Anti-icing and de-icing mitigations for pantograph and Overhead Line Equipment · 29 Jun 2020
- T1214 DECARB: 21st Century DC electrification infill · 5 Jun 2020
all contracts from this buyer →
similar contracts awarded
Other awarded contracts in the same category. Useful for seeing who normally wins this kind of work, and at what value.
- Criminal Justice Data Spine Delivery · Home Office · £2,500,000
- Asset Systems Review · THE GUINNESS PARTNERSHIP LIMITED · £60,000
- 260065 Strategic Consultancy Support · Queen's University Belfast · £448,500
- ITT - Archive Strategic Review (UID 267) · Historic England · £25,000
- TEN-2526-048 (PCR15) - Modern Agile, Product Led Delivery (MAPD) Pilot · National Employment Savings Trust (NEST) · £450,000
- Adults Services Improvement Programme · Bedford Borough Council · £5,357,000
- Travel to School Framework Call off · North Northamptonshire Council
- Rio Gap Analysis · Kent and Medway Mental Health NHS Trust · £19,620
source
Published on Contracts Finder. Contact details for named individuals are not reproduced on this site.